Which of the following options may trigger a requirement for a cost analysis?

A cost analysis is typically required in situations where the proposal is expected to exceed a specified dollar threshold. This threshold is established to ensure that larger contracts undergo thorough examination to confirm that the proposed costs are reasonable and compliant with applicable regulations. This is essential because it allows the government to ensure that the taxpayer's money is being spent wisely and that contractors are providing fair prices for the services and goods they are offering.

The rationale for this requirement stems from the need to maintain oversight and due diligence when significant amounts of public funding are involved. The focus is on both the reliability and efficiency of the contractor’s pricing to ensure that it aligns with the market rates and respects the principles of fairness and competition.

In contrast, while variables such as the contractor’s experience with federal contracts, the presence or absence of multiple bids, and requests for government oversight might influence the procurement strategy or additional scrutiny, they do not inherently trigger a mandatory cost analysis under FAR guidelines. Instead, the established dollar threshold serves as a clear and objective criterion that defines the necessity for this deeper financial review.